In a recent article by Chris Morrison, the Environment Editor at The Daily Sceptic, it was revealed that surface temperatures across Greenland have been cooling for approximately two decades. This finding comes from a study conducted by Thai scientists and mathematicians, who analyzed 31,464 satellite recordings from 2000 to 2019. The study found an average temperature decrease of 0.11°C, signaling a “non-significant change in LST” (land surface temperature).
This new evidence of cooling in the Arctic aligns with previous findings and further challenges the mainstream climate narrative that predicts catastrophic warming and the rapid melting of the Greenland ice sheet. The study’s results are being downplayed, as they contradict the alarming predictions of rising sea levels tied to the ice sheet’s melting.
Despite this cooling trend, the researchers noted that the ice-free areas of Greenland were warmer than the ice-covered regions, which the authors attributed to “population density.” This suggests that urban heat, not climate change, might be skewing the temperature data, even in Greenland.
The findings have raised eyebrows, especially after the World Economic Forum recently published a study warning of a “total collapse” of the Greenland ice sheet. This alarming prediction has been widely criticized as unrealistic and echoes other scaremongering tactics designed to promote the Net Zero agenda.
In contrast to the climate alarmism surrounding Greenland, there has been little scientific acknowledgment of natural variability and its role in temperature fluctuations. The Thai researchers found no evidence of warming over both ice-free and ice-covered areas. Instead, they pointed to previous work by Japanese scientists, who suggested that the El Niño Southern Oscillation played a significant role in recent changes to the Arctic climate.
This points to the growing body of evidence that natural factors, rather than human activity, are likely driving the climate variations observed in Greenland and the broader Arctic region. These findings further question the reliability of climate models, which have struggled to account for the natural variability in the region’s climate.
Additionally, similar patterns of cooling have been observed in Antarctica, where recent studies have highlighted a 2°C drop in temperatures over the past 20 years. These findings further undermine the narrative of unchecked global warming, with natural climate variations once again cited as the most plausible explanation for the observed changes.
The cooling trend in both Greenland and Antarctica calls into question the mainstream climate models that predict rapid warming and widespread environmental disaster. As new evidence continues to emerge, the narrative surrounding climate change is increasingly being challenged by real-world data that points to natural variability, rather than anthropogenic influences, as the driving force behind climate fluctuations.